Warning: Constant WP_DEBUG already defined in C:\wwwroot\ebooks.wiki\wp-config.php on line 98

Warning: Constant WP_DEBUG_LOG already defined in C:\wwwroot\ebooks.wiki\wp-config.php on line 99

Warning: Constant WP_DEBUG_DISPLAY already defined in C:\wwwroot\ebooks.wiki\wp-config.php on line 100
Philosophy of Syntax: Foundational Topics: 29 (Trends in Logic, 29)-电子书百科大全

Philosophy of Syntax: Foundational Topics: 29 (Trends in Logic, 29)

Philosophy of Syntax: Foundational Topics: 29 (Trends in Logic, 29)
by: Mieszko Talasiewicz (Author)
Publisher:Springer
Edition:2010th
Publication Date: 10 Dec. 2009
Language:English
Print Length:195 pages
ISBN-10:9789048132874
ISBN-13:9789048132874
Book Description
Abstract In the chapter some preliminary methodological issues are discussed, including the demarcation between logic and linguistics and the shortcomings of empirical base of the theory of syntax. An epistemological approach to language is sketched out and a need for the proper balance between logical aspects of natural language and vernacular usage is claimed crucial for any reliable theory of syntax and – mantics. Learnability and efficiency are presented as the most important c- straints to be imposed upon a logical analysis of language. Keywords Linguistics, Logic, Methodology, Natural Language 1. 1 Epistemological Background of the Problem of Syntax Among central questions of epistemology two are the most fundamental: how language is related to the reality that we talk about in this language, and how one can rationally learn what this reality is like. Let us label these questions resp- tively ‘the question of reference’ and ‘the question of method’. Certainly these two are very closely interconnected. Perhaps some solution to the problem of r- erence would solve the problem of method: the way in which language refers to reality would tell us how to verify the sentences of this language. But in general it can be otherwise. Equally imaginable is the case that we know what (e. g. which possible states of affairs) our sentences refer to but we do not know (scil. we c- not rationally justify our belief in this respect), whether they are true (scil.
About the Author

 收藏 (0) 打赏

您可以选择一种方式赞助本站

支付宝扫一扫赞助

微信钱包扫描赞助

未经允许不得转载:电子书百科大全 » Philosophy of Syntax: Foundational Topics: 29 (Trends in Logic, 29)

分享到: 生成海报

评论 抢沙发

评论前必须登录!

立即登录   注册

登录

忘记密码 ?

切换登录

注册

我们将发送一封验证邮件至你的邮箱, 请正确填写以完成账号注册和激活