Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking
by: David Brian Robertson (Author)
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PR
Publication Date: 2 Jan. 2013
Language: English
Print Length: 344 pages
ISBN-10: 0199796297
ISBN-13: 9780199769247
Book Description
The eighty-five famous essays by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay--known collectively as the Federalist Papers--comprise the lens through which we typically view the ideas behind the U.S. Constitution. But we are wrong to do so, writes David Brian Robertson, if we really want to know what the Founders were thinking. In this provocative new account of the framing of the Constitution, Robertson observes that the Federalist Papers represented only one side in a fierce argument that was settled by compromise--in fact, multiple compromises. Drawing on numerous primary sources, Robertson unravels the highly political dynamics that shaped the document. Hamilton and Madison, who hailed from two of the larger states, pursued an ambitious vision of a robust government with broad power. Leaders from smaller states envisioned only a few added powers, sufficient to correct the disastrous weakness of the Articles of Confederation, but not so strong as to threaten the governing systems within their own states. The two sides battled for three arduous months; the Constitution emerged piece by piece, the product of an evolving web of agreements. Robertson examines each contentious debate, including arguments over the balance between the federal government and the states, slavery, war and peace, and much more. In nearly every case, a fractious, piecemeal, and very political process prevailed. In this way, the convention produced a government of separate institutions, each with the will and ability to defend its independence. Majorities would rule, but the Constitution made it very difficult to assemble majorities large enough to let the government act. Brilliantly argued and deeply researched, this book will change the way we think of "original intent." With a bracing willingness to challenge old pieties, Robertson rescues the political realities that created the government we know today.
About the Author
Review The Original Compromise combines profound scholarship with remarkably accessible writing to make more clear than ever before just how and why the Constitution emerged in the form that it did. Robertson is attentive to the framers' ideas and their intertwined interests, and he traces persuasively the initiatives, negotiations, and compromises that led to their imperfect but enduring achievement. ― Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania
Book Description A brilliant, provocative new look at the framing of the Constitution, illuminating the very political horse-trading behind our most basic and cherished law
About the Author University of Missouri Curators Teaching Professor and Professor of Political Science, University of Missouri-St. Louis
未经允许不得转载：电子书百科大全 » Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking
评论前必须登录！
登陆 注册